Archive for March, 2005

Teachers Enter War on Meth

March 30, 2005

source: WVLT VOLUNTEER TV Knoxville, :

——
“Many signs of change are behavioral, for example the people they hang out with.”
“At the state level, law enforcement hopes that teachers can help them identify at risk kids before they are hooked on the drugs or are caught up in the next drug bust.”
——

How can you teach or understand this without cognition of adolescent body image and what was prescribed as a dietry aid in the early 70’s (NZ 1974, 120million scripts, 2Mppl).

We have notable MP’s in the house of reps. for whom getting the scrip as a young housewife can only be described as an addiction with authorisation. It was ‘pure’, as pure as you could get. As it was in post war Japan and Korea. Clinical grade manufacture and efficent pyramid distribution… led to 5% of population addiction rates. (absent the criminal violence). It was the “Valley of the Dolls” across diverse and distant cultures.

The ‘herbal’ stimulant market today is less herbal in origin than crack is to coco.

Methamphetamine equally had its organic origin in the chinese ephedra plant “ma whang” found to be effacious as a decongestant and appettite suppressant 5000 years ago. (Doubtless the Chinese practitioners would have been very cautious about giving a powerful ‘herb’ the equivalent of Ritilin’s amphetamine type effect to children too.)

How does it help to have seemingly purposfully ill-informed teachers observing the whole group, expecting them to look for subtle deviance from norms that are indistinguishable from difference and angst IN hormone laden teens?.

Teachers are subject to perceptions and flaws stemming from diverse community moral and value systems. It is very risky to introduce a legal/criminal dilemma on cautious or precautionary suspicion.

The LAW cannot do this for good reason, so why should teachers?

Cannabis is losing its cool for the young – The Observer UK

March 28, 2005

The Observer | UK News | Cannabis is losing its cool for the young:

I have just read Illicit drugs policy : using evidence to get better outcomes Dr Alex Wodak contributed to it

Also unsurprisingly – the obvious ommission from the early entry pot turns’ya psycho is any journalistic insight on health promotion and harm minimisation strategies. The bastards might have found that cannabis is “losing its cool for the young.”, where one of the lead researchers very precautionary advise is dont discount law reform.

[looking up to be a good election! ]

“Dr Lydia Krabbendam of Maastricht University, whose study showed that adolescents who use cannabis regularly over a four-year period were twice as likely to develop psychosis, said: ‘I don’t think the effects of cannabis can be used as an argument not to legalise it. It is probably very hard to ban it altogether, and if you legalise it you can regulate the amounts of THC [the active ingredient within cannabis]’.

Meanwhile, a survey released today shows that teenagers place illegal drugs at the bottom of the list of ways to get high. The study by the government drugs awareness campaign, Frank, shows that more than one in four 11- to 19-year-olds get their ‘best buzz’ from winning at their favourite sport. Only three per cent said that drugs gave them the best high. “

—— ends —–

“I’m unsurprised”……(Blair)

Prof. Fergusson – causal linkages cannabis/psychotic symptoms

March 27, 2005

Tests of causal linkages between cannabis use and psychotic symptoms – Addiction, Vol 100, Issue 3, pp. 354-366 (Abstract):

“RESEARCH REPORT” Tests of causal linkages between cannabis use and psychotic symptoms

David M. Fergusson1, L. John Horwood1 & Elizabeth M. Ridder1

ABSTRACT

Aim To examine possible causal linkages between cannabis use and psychosis using data gathered over the course of a 25-year longitudinal study.”

Cannabis: Too much, too young? – New Scientist

March 26, 2005

Graham Lawton calls in the Cannabis / Psychosis debate [New Scientist]
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18524921.300

For [Professor] Iversen though, this is still stretching the evidence. “What the data show is that the risk applies to a small minority of young people who start smoking cannabis at a very young age,” he says. “Are we going to change the law for the benefit of a vulnerable minority? A small minority of people are vulnerable to liver damage if they drink even a small amount of alcohol, but we haven’t changed the law to protect them.”

sig. Blair Anderson

Educators fail to teach youth – Editorial

March 23, 2005

……..
Since it is impossible to prevent teenagers from having access to the
products, education is the only way to prevent young people from
experiencing neural impairment, convulsions, deafness, blindness or
dying from “huffing” inhalants.
……..

http://www.dailygamecock.com/news/2005/03/23/Viewpoints/Editorial.Educators.Fail.To.Teach.Youth.About.Inhalants-900251.shtml

Check the spin “Eighty percent of new users were younger than 17.” This
is double speak. 100% of the sample was under 17.

Are we going mad?
Does no one understand that prohibition IS the context of double
standards and impediments to credible drug education?

sig. Blair Anderson
50 Wainoni Road. Christchurch, NZ.
http://mildgreens.com http://mildgreens.blogspot.com/

NZ teens part of study into cannabis mental health risk

March 23, 2005

Research carried out on New Zealand teenagers has confirmed cannabis use is a serious risk factor for schizophrenia.

WEDNESDAY, 23 MARCH 2005 [NZPA] / By KENT ATKINSON

http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/print/0,1478,3226588a10,00.html

“There is a small but significant minority of people who have a predisposition to psychosis and who would be well advised to steer clear of cannabis,” a Dutch researcher, Jim van Os, said in the latest New Scientist magazine, due to be published next Saturday.

Dr van Os, a psychiatrist at the University of Maastricht, investigates the effect of marijuana on people’s brains – particularly adolescents’ brains. He and other researchers have been building a scientific case that, for some teenagers, smoking cannabis leads to serious mental health problems in later life, including schizophrenia.

Dr van Os said claims that marijuana is responsible for up to 13 per cent of schizophrenia cases in the Netherlands. He said the figure will only increase because cannabis use among teenagers was increasing in many countries, the age at first use was falling and the strength of cannabis was rising.

Part of the research is based on a study that followed 759 people born in Dunedin, New Zealand, in 1972 and 1973 and was reported in the British Medical Journal.

After carefully controlling for self-medication and other confounding factors, researchers found that those who had smoked cannabis three times or more before the age of 15 were much more likely to suffer symptoms of schizophrenia by the time they were 26 – they had a 10 per cent chance compared with 3 per cent for the general population.

The team concluded that there was a vulnerable minority of teenagers for whom cannabis is harmful.

“We’re not saying that cannabis is the major cause of schizophrenia,” said Robin Murray of the Institute of Psychiatry in London says Murray, who led the study. “But it’s a risk factor.”

“I don’t think we can deny it any longer,” said epidemiologist Mary Cannon of the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, based in Dublin, who helped carry out the New Zealand study. “Cannabis is part of the cause of schizophrenia.”

And late last year Dr van Os and his team brought out further results following a group of nearly 2500 14 to 24-year-olds living in and around Munich, Germany, over four years. They found that, overall, smoking cannabis as an adolescent moderately raised the risk of developing signs of psychosis later on, from 16 per cent to 25 per cent.

But when they focused on individuals who were known to be susceptible to psychosis – those who were showing signs of disturbed thought processes by age 11 – they found a much stronger link.

Susceptible individuals who avoided cannabis had a 25 per cent chance of developing psychosis. Susceptible individuals who smoked it had a 50 per cent risk. And the more cannabis they smoked, and the earlier they smoked it, the worse the outcome.

In the Netherlands, the findings have fuelled a growing clamour for reform of the laws regulating drug use. In Britain, Dr van Os’s findings have been seized upon by politicians, tabloid newspapers and mental-health lobby groups who want drug laws tightened up.

A mental-health charity, Sane, has called for the reclassification of cannabis to be reversed. And the British Government recently acknowledged the link in its strongest terms yet, when it said in a press release that cannabis was an “important causal factor” in mental illness.

The New Scientist reported that, compared with substances like heroin and crack cocaine, cannabis was seen by many people as relatively harmless, and in the UK marijuana was downgraded from a class B to a class C drug last year, meaning people caught with small quantities were not usually arrested.

New Scientist reported one research avenue that may shed further light on the matter was to look at whether genes are involved.

In the New Zealand study, the number of people who had smoked dope on three occasions by the age of 15 was just 29, and only three went on to develop psychosis, but Dr Cannon’s research team recently re-analysed the data from it.

This time, they added in in another variable – genetic predisposition to schizophrenia.

The gene they investigated, called COMT, encodes an enzyme (catechol-O-methyl transferase) that breaks down a signalling chemical in the brain called dopamine. COMT comes in two forms, one of which is marginally more common in people with schizophrenia and is thought to be a risk factor for the disease.

The results were crystal clear.

The team found that in New Zealanders with two copies of the “normal” version of COMT, smoking cannabis had little effect on their mental health. In people with one normal and one “bad” form of the gene, smoking cannabis slightly increased their risk of psychosis.

But for people with two copies of the bad gene, cannabis spelled trouble: smoking it as a teenager increased their likelihood of developing psychosis by a factor of 10.

The results have not yet been published, and Dr Cannon warned that they needed replicating, but even so she said: “This is a very large effect, similar to the size of smoking and lung cancer. This is a very significant finding.”

What should be done about it, however, remained an open question. Dr van Os told New Scientist that teenagers with a personal or family history of mental illness should be urged to steer clear of the drug. He also advocated legal changes: governments should focus on keeping cannabis out of the hands of teenagers.
[end]

sig. Blair Anderson 50 Wainoni Road. Christchurch, NZ. http://mildgreens.com & http://mildgreens.blogspot.com/ cell phone 027 2657219 ph (643) 389 4065
In an age of conformity, of conventional wisdom, of suffocating pieties, reform is a breath of fresh air. – Simon Carr, The Independent, Jan03

Boys 12, 13 charged with selling drugs

March 23, 2005

Juvenile access to cannabis is assured under the premise of prohibition and a ‘law in gross disrepute’. (re: Monroe boys 12, 13 charged with selling drugs)

It is shameful that we treat young folk as criminals in order to send a message of intolerance of adult consensual activities. No doubt the ‘moral panic’ will invoke the very worst predictions for these kids (as evident by some comments here) but in reality what these kids are doing (both possession and sale) has become quite normal BECAUSE of prohibition financially incentivising the distribution network. There can be no doubt issues of young people and drugs is something we need to do something about… but it wont be fixed unless we address ourselves to the core problem – the abject failure of prohibitors to demonstrate efficacy of their rules. These kids are just a case in point.

Morning Call Online. https://www.mcall.com/news/local

No retreat on cannabis

March 22, 2005

Guardian Unlimited Politics | Special Reports | No retreat on cannabis

“Much fuss has been aired in the red-top papers about these two studies, but with few quotes from the researchers. Yet the professor who led the New Zealand project told the New Zealand Herald: ‘These are not huge increases in risk and nor should they be, because cannabis is by no means the only thing that will determine if you suffer these symptoms.’ ”

Doh!

Mr Horn, Help me out here,

March 22, 2005

re: County Supervisor Horn To Introduce Anti-Marijuana Initiative   21st March 2005   KFMBTV  San Diego

Bill Horn’s advocacy for HARM, the ‘Health Advocates Rejecting Marijuana’ initiative is strikingly ironic when one considers the social implications of the latest Seattle/Washington call to medicalise all illicit drugs. County Supervisor Horn may find it odd that this legalise drugs call is not from some marginalised band of lazy radicals.

Compared to his small stake holder list of treatment providers the learned folk from the King County Medical Society, Physicians for Social Responsibility and Washington Family Physicians, with the professional associations of Osteopathic Medical, State Pharmacy, Psychiatric, Psychological, Public Health, Addiction Medicine and the Loren Miller, King County  and State Bar Associations support a drug war exit strategy, the medicalisation of all illicit drugs. [ G. JOHNSON / APReuters.]

Mr Horn, help me out here, what do you know about ‘first do no harm’  that these accredited Washington public health and law folk do not?

BTW Christchurch is the Sister City of Seattle… My blog below tracks the thread..

cc: King County Bar Assoc. attn: Roger Goodman mailto:RogerG@kcba.org 
cited: http://www.kfmb.com/story.php?id=7994

Muriel Newman pulls one out of the hat

March 21, 2005

Dr Muriel Newman pulls one out of the hat….a crucial Smokefree-Free Environments (Exemptions) Bill

see http://rodneyhide.com/Diary/index.php?p=1025

  1. Principals Indeed Indeed… Smokefree Amendments might need to address reinstatement of the provisions for “Herbal Smoking Products” removed so secretively due to latent legislative implications for cannabis law reform. But n’er a test of principals be? Dr. Newman, what say you? Some socially liberal Amsterdam style adult choice smoking establishments sounds very civil to me.
  2. If the publican doesn’t object, employees don’t object and the patrons want it, then where is the crime?, concurs the ‘Mildgreens’.
    Comment by mildgreens — 22 March 2005 @ 1:58 am

This is shaping up to be a very interesting election.