Archive for the ‘Auckland University of Technology’ Category

Judge Jerry Paradis on 95bFM [12 Sept]

October 19, 2008

Mikey Havoc, New Zealand media personality -- ...Havoc via Wikipedia

MP3, 11minutes, 2.6MB, first broadcast 12 September 2008.
Jerry Paradis, retired judge from the Provincial Court of British Columbia,
(note: Mikey Havoc interviewed Law Enforcement Against Prohibition‘s Eddie Ellison for TV3 network in April 2004 /Blair)

Pro Vice-Chancellor’s Winter Lecture – ‘Drugs and the Law’

September 7, 2008


Time: 4.30pm, September 12, 2008.

In association with the Gambling and Addictions Research Centre, National Institute for Public Health and Mental Health Research, AUT University, and the New Zealand Legal and Social Philosophy Society

You are invited to the following lecture by visiting Canadian judge Jerry Paradis. He is in New Zealand to make a submission to the NZ Law Commission’s Review on Drug Policy and the Law. His visit has received widespread media attention.

Following the lecture there will be time for questions and discussion, refreshments and socialising.

While of particular relevance to lawyers, public health professionals and others who work in the drugs field, this lecture will be of interest to many people who variously engage in, think about and are affected by drug use and drug policy.

RSVPs are ESSENTIAL mailto:sheree.green-molloy@aut.ac.nz

location map see
http://nzlsp.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/map_-_wellesley_campus-of-aut.pdf

Judge Jerry Paradis,
Judge, Provincial Court of British Columbia, 1975-2003
Director, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
‘Drugs and the Law’

Judge Paradis has dealt with over a thousand drug cases. He seeks a reduction in drug-related harms – to individuals, families and wider society. However, he sees present drug law and its application as a contributor to these harms, rather than a solution. During his nearly 30 years on the bench Judge Paradis became increasingly disillusioned with prohibition and criminal justice approaches to drug use. Reflecting on notes from cases he presided over, Judge Paradis reflects the same number of people are choosing to ingest mood-altering substances, the same proportion are addicted, and there is the same persistent but increasingly lucrative and efficient system of supply. We – citizens, police and judges – have lived and worked within the orthodoxy that all drugs are inherently evil (except, of course, alcohol) and that prohibition and punishment can rid us of the. How wrong we have been.”

This lecture draws on the speaker’s expertise in human rights, jurisprudence and the international debate concerning drug policy and the place of the law and harm minimisation.

Sheree Green-Molloy mailto:sheree.green-molloy@aut.ac.nz

Executive Assistant for Professor Max Abbott
Pro Vice-Chancellor and Dean
Faculty of Health & Environmental Sciences
AUT University (North Shore)
90 Akoranga Drive
Private Bag 92006, Northcote
Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Ph: + 64 9 921 9894
Fax: + 64 9 921 9706

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Call for Cannabis Law change on Health and Justice Grounds

September 3, 2000

Health Studies Faculty
Call for Cannabis Law change on Health and Justice Grounds

Release Date: Friday, August 11, 2000

Cathy Gunn, External Blackboard Lecturer

An immediate relaxation of cannabis laws, so that possession of small quantities of the drug for personal use is no longer a criminal offence, has been called for by a leading health expert.

Professor Max Abbott, Dean of the Faculty of Health Studies at Auckland University of Technology, made the call to day (Sunday August 13) at the official launch of the Coalition for Cannabis Law Reform in Wellington.

Professor Abbott says a formal investigation of th e economic,social and health impacts of more extensive reform should follow this law change, including the possibility of state control of the production and di stribution of cannabis. This could include consideration of potential ga ins from using tax revenue from legal cannabis sales to fund drug education, pre vention and treatment programmes, he says. “It is essential that this investigation is fully informed and involves widespread consultation throughout all sectors of society. This will be very difficult to say the least while people who acknowledge or are believed to be using cannabis remain under threat of criminal conviction. “

I favour a law change because I want to see reduced cannabis consumption in the future, particularly on the part of young people and other at-risk groups. This may seem contradictory but I believe it follows logically when the focus is on cannabis, the drug in its actual social context rather than on cannabis the myth, cannabis the dogma, cannabis the fantasy,” Professor Abbott says.

In his address, Professor Abbott quoted sections of a paper that he gave at the Great Marijuana Debate held in the Auckland Town Hall 16 years ago. This 1984 meeting, chaired by Peter Williams QC on behalf of the Criminal Bar Association, attracted an audience of over 1,200 people and was broadcast live nation-wide.

The meeting was a response to a call by Judge Nick Brown for public debate of cannabis law reform. Professor Abbott says he is disappointed that after 16 years of debate on the issue, most people remained poorly informed, and opponents of reform still tend to rely on “rhetoric and emotion rather than logical argument.” “The fact is, the present law does not work and is counterproductive. I am convinced that it is time for change.”

Professor Abbott says he is in favour of law change because:

* Under the present law cannabis consumption has increased
* In most places where the law has been relaxed consumption has not significantly increased
* Relative to other legal drugs and gambling the known health costs of moderate cannabis use are insignificant and treating cannabis differently from more harmful substances and activities is hypocritical and illogical
* Current laws waste scarce criminal justice resources that could be put to better use fighting serious crime and supporting victims of crime, are applied in a discriminatory manner, stigmatise many otherwise law-abiding citizens, and probably constitute more of a health hazard than cannabis use per se.
* The present situation inhibits full public education and debate about cannabis use, research, and access to help for the small number of people who are cannabis dependent
* The present situation contributes to serious crime and may lead some regular cannabis users into criminal circles and on to other drugs that have serious adverse health consequences.

Professor Abbott says he believes that more radical reform, including state control of production and distribution, requires detailed investigation before implementation. He says there is a danger that Government could get seduced by the allure of high tax revenues and lose sight of its role in controlling consumption. Gambling, where about one-in-five regular gaming machine participants become serious problem gamblers, provides a cautionary note, according to Professor Abbott.

For more information please contact: Professor Max Abbott Dean of the Faculty of Health Studies Auckland University of Technology (AUT) Phone: 09 6315470 09 307 9894 021-680583 For more information please contact : Professor Max Abbott

Blair Anderson
http://mildgreens.blogspot.com

Related articles by Zemanta

Call for Cannabis Law change on Health and Justice Grounds

August 12, 2000

Media Release: Health Studies Faculty

Call for Cannabis Law change on Health and Justice GroundsAuckland University of TechnologyImage via Wikipedia
August 11, 2000

Cathy Gunn, External Blackboard Lecturer

An immediate relaxation of cannabis laws, so that possession of small quantities of the drug for personal use is no longer a criminal offence, has been called for by a leading health expert. Professor Max Abbott, Dean of the Faculty of Health Studies at Auckland University of Technology, made the call to day (Sunday August 13) at the official launch of the Coalition for Cannabis Law Reform in Wellington.

Professor Abbott says a formal investigation of the economic,social and health impacts of more extensive reform should follow this law change, including the possibility of state control of the production and di stribution of cannabis. This could include consideration of potential gains from using tax revenue from legal cannabis sales to fund drug education, prevention and treatment programmes, he says. “It is essential that this investigation is fully informed and involves widespread consultation throughout all sectors of society. This will be very difficult to say the least while people who acknowledge or are believed to be using cannabis remain under threat of criminal conviction.

“I favour a law change because I want to see reduced c annabis consumption in the future, particularly on the part of young people and other at-risk groups. This may seem contradictory but I believe it follows logically when the focus is on cannabis, the drug in its actual social context rather than on cannabis the myth, cannabis the dogma, cannabis the fantasy,” Professor Abbott says.

In his address, Professor Abbott quoted sections of a paper that he gave at the Great Marijuana Debate held in the Auckland Town Hall 16 years ago. This 1984 meeting, chaired by Peter Williams QC on behalf of the Criminal Bar Association, attracted an audience of over 1,200 people and was broadcast live nation-wide. The meeting was a response to a call by Judge Nick Brown for public debate of cannabis law reform.

Professor Abbott says he is disappointed that after 16 years of debate on the issue, most people remained poorly informed, and opponents of reform still tend to rely on “rhetoric and emotion rather than logical argument.”

“The fact is, the present law does not work and is counterproductive. I am convinced that it is time for change.”

Professor Abbott says he is in favour of law change because:

  • Under the present law cannabis consumption has increased
  • In most places where the law has been relaxed consumption has not significantly increased
  • Relative to other legal drugs and gambling the known health costs of moderate cannabis use are insignificant and treating cannabis differently from more harmful substances and activities is hypocritical and illogical
  • Current laws waste scarce criminal justice resources that could be put to better use fighting serious crime and supporting victims of crime, are applied in a discriminatory manner, stigmatise many otherwise law-abiding citizens, and probably constitute more of a health hazard than cannabis use per se.
  • The present situation inhibits full public education and debate about cannabis use, research, and access to help for the small number of people who are cannabis dependent
  • The present situation contributes to serious crime and may lead some regular cannabis users into criminal circles and on to other drugs that have serious adverse health consequences.

Professor Abbott says he believes that more radical reform, including state control of production and distribution, requires detailed investigation before implementation. He says there is a danger that Government could get seduced by the allure of high tax revenues and lose sight of its role in controlling consumption. Gambling, where about one-in-five regular gaming machine participants become serious problem gamblers, provides a cautionary note, according to Professor Abbott.

For more information please contact: Professor Max Abbott Dean of the Faculty of Health Studies Auckland University of Technology (AUT) Phone: 09 6315470 09 307 9894 021-680583

Blair Anderson
http://mildgreens.blogspot.com
Related articles by Zemanta