Archive for the ‘Crime and Justice’ Category

Shapelle Corby on LawFuel

December 29, 2009

This case exemplifies all that is wrong with the international drug covenants and conventions to which New Zealand is a signatory.

Recent hangings in South East Asia, firing squads in China, and most recently two Kiwi’s arrested (and presumed guilty) for 3.5oz of cannabis between them in India, (the home of Ganja, a plant named as sacred along with the river Ganges) all happen because we as a nation collectively give licence to kill and incarcerate cruelly and inhumanely.

Where is the legal profession on drug policy?

Or is the substantial legal aid grift and perpetual social mayhem an incentive for a silence closely resembling stupidity? NZ’s own National Drug Intelligence Bureau chief along with the BERL Drug Harm report (though much criticised) states that the revenue ‘churn’ through the legal system is a DRUG HARM.

The LEGAL profession are beneficiaries of the unintended consequences. So when are you collectively going to talk about that?

To the Law Commission? Yeah Right!

Curiously, in Christchurch’s sister city Seattle, it was the law profession that lead drug policy law reform. see King County Bar Association – http://www.kcba.org/druglaw/

“The principal objectives of this effort are: reductions in crime and public disorder; improvement of the public health; better protection of children; and wiser use of scarce public resources.”

sig Blair Anderson, Christchurch. 027 2657219
http://www.leap.cc http://mildgreens.blogspot.com

Prison Staff, Prison Inmates, Prison Gardens

June 8, 2009

If evidence informed social policy, pot would be compulsory in prisons.

They should grow their own and enough for everybody else who needs it.

NZ Prison Service shouldnt have much difficulty in finding the expertise. Such policy;
  • (a) will reduce prison muster.
  • (b) displace P.
  • (c) meet demand for medpot.
  • (d) keep it away from kids.
  • (e) ameliorate inmate violence.
  • (f) make National Drug Intelligence redundant.
  • (g) make Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party redundant.
  • (h) and give 600 Police nothing to do.
While these corrections folk were ostensibly getting away with ‘drug dealing’ under the most enforced prohibition environment in NZ (and thus deserve a freaken medal) no one notices that the same draconian policy targeting consenting adults is somehow expected to bear fruit in civvy street.

The alcoholic finds a sanction from a total change of mind, so too for the drug dependant,
Open your eyes, the Saviour you can find, and the peace of mind you’ll be given,
And discover the you, let your soul shine through, and get high on the love you can inspire,
‘Cause you’re a lamb worth saving, from immoral recruitment,
Break the link to the chain.

:from Rumataka Prison Blues, Set the Captives Free

Blair Anderson
http://mildgreens.blogspot.com/

Related articles by Zemanta

Budget: Prohibition or Pragma

May 29, 2009

WELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND - MAY 26:  A general v...Image by Getty Images via Daylife

Law and order is also a priority for this Government. In a number of areas, the need for extra resourcing was becoming urgent.

The Budget provides more than $900 million in operating and capital funding over the next four years for initiatives across the justice sector.

Police will receive $183 million to provide 600 more Police by 2011. Half of them will be in Counties-Manukau, with the others spread across the rest of New Zealand.

The Budget also funds tougher anti-money laundering measures, so that New Zealand will meet its international commitments.

Some funding will address more local problems, notably profits from cannabis and methamphetamine sales.

We need to address many downstream pressures within the Justice and Corrections systems. Community Probation and Psychological services will receive an additional $256 million to manage the increased number of offenders serving community sentences and improve the quality of parole and home detention management.

We also know that our prisons are under pressure.

The Budget provides $3 million in 2008/09 and $385 million over the next four years for increased prison capacity and planning for further potential expansion.

Meanwhile, Netherlands closes 5 prisons… Doh!

/Blair Anderson
http://mildgreens.blogspot.com

Related articles by Zemanta


Police Powers – Nandor’s observervations

February 13, 2009

Former Green MP, Nandor Tanczos sent to my Bebo…..

Two pieces of ‘law and order’ legislation are being debated by parliament under urgency. The first is the Gangs and Organised Crime Bill. Going by the press release, it seems like a typical case of throwing good legislative time after bad. Justice Minister Simon Power says “”By doubling the sentence for participation in a gang we are reflecting the culpability of those gang leaders who organise the manufacture and distribution of methamphetamine, and we are addressing the low rate of successful convictions”.

Eh? It appears that selling P is a worse crime if you are a Mongrel Mob member than if you are an evil sociopath with no friends. Not quite sure why. Nor am I sure why doubling the sentence will increase the number of convictions. (The release says that “of 339 prosecutions there were only 19 convictions” which I guess highlights either how poorly thought out the original legislation was or how incompetent the police are).

They ARE lowering the threshold for the police to get warrants, from investigation of offenses attracting 10 years to ones attracting 7. Of course if this is about targeting P as the Minister claims then this is irrelevant because manufacture and sale of P has a maximum of life.

Actually, it is already very easy for police to get warrants if they have a scrap of evidence to base an application on. The police always moan to politicians that the reason why they can’t get on top of gangs is because they are hobbled by pesky laws protecting civil rights. So politicians give police more powers, and shortly thereafter the police are back with the same complaint. That is how civil rights are consistently and continuously undermined. Just have a look at the new campaign to give police yet more powers over boy racers.

All in all, much as it grieves me to agree with Mr Cosgrove, it looks like political theatre gone bad. Sir Graham Latimer got it right when he said that the quickest way to destabilise gangs is to legalise cannabis.

The other bill is about DNA samples.From the press release:

“It allows police to collect DNA from people they ‘intend to charge’, and to match it against samples from unsolved crimes. At present, DNA can be collected only with consent, by judicial approval, or by compulsion where people are suspected or convicted of an offence punishable by more than seven years’ imprisonment, or another specified offence”

So it is about giving the police the right to take DNA from anyone they wish (I intend to charge you….when I’ve got some evidence) and to use that for a fishing trip through the DNA database.

“And any misuse of profiles will be subject to the full extent of relevant law and civil rights protections, and the police will develop guidelines to avoid any arbitrary or unreasonable application of this power”.

Just like they did with Tazers, MoDA search without warrant powers, pepper spray right? Somehow I don’t feel comforted.


Blair Anderson ‹(•¿•)›

Spokesperson on Climate Change, Environment and Associate ‘Shadow’ Law And Order.
http://www.Republicans.org.NZ

Social Ecologist ‘at large’
http://mildgreens.blogspot.com
http://blairformayor.blogspot.com
http://blair4mayor.com
http://efsdp.org

ph (643) 389 4065 cell 027 265 7219
Related articles by Zemanta

Three guilty of brutal ‘prohibition’ killing

December 5, 2008

Another prohibition murder accrues to the account of bad policy masked by good intentions. /Blair

Three guilty of brutal killing
NZH 05 Dec 2008

Two men and a woman have been remanded for sentence after being found guilty of the brutal killing of a 26-year-old man in his home as his partner and toddler hid in a bathroom. Guy Nicholas Wilson, 36, from Otara, Paul Junior Grace, 24, from East Tamaki, and Annette Louise Elaine Heta, 27, were jointly accused of murdering Jason Noe Kai Chong Boon.

Police National Drug Intelligence?

A map of the Auckland urban area. Modified w:I...Blue: no drugs
Yellow: some drugs
Grey: lots of drugs

An Auckland High Court jury this week found Wilson guilty of murder and Grace and Heta guilty of manslaughter. Grace pleaded guilty of assault with intent to rob, and Wilson and Heta were found guilty of assault with intent to rob. They were remanded in custody for sentencing on March 5. Crown prosecutor Kirsten Lummis told the court that Mr Boon, who was known to the defendants, was involved in the drugs scene. [more]

Update, Herald on Sunday milks the “Home Invasion” story from the mothers perspective.

see http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2008/12/09/murder-trial.html

Distinguish Use and Misuse.

November 1, 2008

‘We must distinguish between drug use and misuse’ – Fr Peter McVerry

SOCIETY needs to make a distinction between drug use and drug misuse and should consider the legal supply of drugs. [29Oct2008]

Image by dogwelder via Flickr

This call was made by veteran homelessness campaigner Fr Peter McVerry in a speech at a conference on drugs last night. Fr McVerry said adults should take a “long and critical” look at their own drug use, namely alcohol and prescription drugs, such as valium. “It is hypocritical to expect our young people to stay away from drugs, when we adults won’t,” he told the conference, organised by the Addiction Training Institute.

He said adults had fostered a culture of consumerism and individualism, which did not value young people for what they were and destroyed their sense of community. The Jesuit priest, who has worked with homeless young people for 30 years, said he had seen the “devastation” caused by illegal drugs, particularly heroin and cocaine. “I spend much of my time helping young people to come off drugs. As a priest, I bury, on average, one young person a month who has died from a drug overdose, some of whom I would have been very close to.” But he said there was a massive difference between drug user per se and drug misuse. Dublin - No DrugsImage by hippydream via Flickr

“I do it along the lines of alcohol. Many people use alcohol but it doesn’t have any dire consequence for themselves or for anybody else and people can use drugs without it having any dire consequences for themselves or anyone else, whereas the misuse of drugs is where drugs have consequences for oneself, one’s family or one’s community.”

He said 98% of those who experiment with drugs do not go on to misuse them. “If you want to find out why young people take drugs, go into any pub any night of the week and ask the adults why they take alcohol. The reasons are the same.

Adults would say we take alcohol in order to relax, as a focus for socialising, in order to escape from the pressures of life and to alter our moods. We take alcohol because we enjoy it. Young people take drugs for exactly the same reasons.”

He said Ireland’s response to illegal drugs has been a predominantly criminal justice approach, which he was “particularly inappropriate” for drug users, who should be helped by way of prevention and education.

He said criminal justice responses should be secondary in dealing with drug misusers, who should be first helped from a social and medical point of view. Fr McVerry said public discussion of drugs was dominated by either a climate of fear or a moral climate. “It would appear to me that the legalisation of drugs must be, at the very least, on our list of policy options to be discussed. If we accept that drugs are here to stay, as I think we must, then our priority ought to be ‘controlling the supply of drugs’.”

He said legalising drugs in the model of alcohol would be a “total disaster” and that their supply would have to be tightly controlled. “We often forget — or are unaware — that we have already legalised one drug, methadone. Methadone is a highly dangerous drug and even more addictive than heroin.”

He said he appreciated that legalising, or controlling the supply of drugs, was politically unrealistic.