Archive for the ‘Jeffrey Miron’ Category

The Inalienable Right to Get High [SOLO]

May 13, 2009

The Inalienable Right to Get High

Tuesday, 12 May 2009, 9:42 am
Press Release: SOLO – Sense of Life Objectivists
SOLO-International Press Release: The Inalienable Right to Get High
May 11, 2009

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s call for a “great debate” about legalizing cannabis should be the catalyst for a great debate about ending the disastrous War on Drugs altogether, says SOLO Principal Lindsay Perigo.

“The infamous President Nixon instigated this unwinnable war in 1971,” Perigo recalls. “As with the equally misbegotten alcohol prohibition of 1919-1933, the only actual winner has been organized crime. The big loser has been the founding tenet of America: freedom. The right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness implies ownership of one’s own body, which subsumes the right to ingest any substance of one’s choosing, regardless of the moral status of such an action.

“Currently in the United States, 775,000 people have been deprived of their liberty and languish in jail for a cannabis offence. That’s more than the total in jail for all types of violent crime— real crime—combined,” Perigo notes.

“On and below America’s southern border a hideous battle is being played out among drug cartels, each other and American authorities trying in vain to curb the flow of drugs to the cartels’ biggest market. Thousands have died and thousands more will die yet, unless this authoritarian catastrophe is halted. More people are now being murdered in Tijuana by the cartels than by Islamofascist filth in Baghdad. And the police cannot be relied upon to provide protection in a culture whose leitmotif is, ‘Take a bribe, or take a bullet.’

“In an echo of this madness in the Antipodes, a New Zealand policeman has recently been shot dead in what was described as a ‘low-risk cannabis operation.’

“It’s no surprise that even a statist like the onetime pro-freedom Traitornator is coming to his senses at a time when government revenues—California’s most notably—are shrinking with the economy. A 2008 study by Harvard economist Jeffrey A. Miron estimated that legalizing drugs would inject $76.8 billion a year into the U.S. economy—$44.1 billion from law enforcement savings, and at least $32.7 billion in tax revenue ($6.7 billion from marijuana, $22.5 billion from cocaine and heroin, the remainder from other drugs).

“The behaviour of government SWAT teams in waging the War on Drugs has often been indistinguishable from that of organised crime itself, except that the latter has been more efficient in confining itself to the elimination of fellow-scumbags, while SWAT teams have on several occasions burst into the wrong homes and summarily executed entirely innocent people.

“Congress itself, abounding as it does in crooked Democrats and sanctimonious Christian Republicans, all high on a tax-funded power-trip, has been persecuting athletes for taking steroids, when this matter is the business of the relevant private sports disciplines and their voluntary contractees alone.

“The War on Drugs is a disgrace, and subverts the credibility of America’s claim to be the land of the free as seriously as any of President Chavez-Obama’s economic policies,” Perigo concludes.

SOLO (Sense of Life Objectivists: SOLOPassion.com)

ENDS

Legalize Drugs to End Border Violence – Miron

March 26, 2009

Mexican soldiers stand over a detained man aft...Image via Wikipedia

Harvard Lecturer: Legalize Drugs to End Border Violence

(Published 03/24/2009 by Talkleft)

Another voice in the small but growing crowd urging legalization of drugs to end the Mexico drug war violence: Harvard Senior Lecturer in Economics Jeffrey Miron.

Argument 1: Prohibition creates violence. It happened with alcohol and gambling. End the prohibition, end the violence. [More…]

Prohibition creates violence because it drives the drug market underground. This means buyers and sellers cannot resolve their disputes with lawsuits, arbitration or advertising, so they resort to violence instead.

Violence was common in the alcohol industry when it was banned during Prohibition, but not before or after. Violence is the norm in illicit gambling markets but not in legal ones. Violence is routine when prostitution is banned but not when it’s permitted. Violence results from policies that create black markets, not from the characteristics of the good or activity in question. The only way to reduce violence, therefore, is to legalize drugs (emphasis supplied.)

But, there are other reasons, according to Miron: Such as, legalize drugs, reduce bribery.

Prohibition of drugs corrupts politicians and law enforcement by putting police, prosecutors, judges and politicians in the position to threaten the profits of an illicit trade.

Criminalization of drugs erodes our constitutional rights:

Prohibition erodes protections against unreasonable search and seizure because neither party to a drug transaction has an incentive to report the activity to the police. Thus, enforcement requires intrusive tactics such as warrantless searches or undercover buys. The victimless nature of this so-called crime also encourages police to engage in racial profiling.

Prohibition is bad for national security:

Prohibition has disastrous implications for national security. By eradicating coca plants in Colombia or poppy fields in Afghanistan, prohibition breeds resentment of the United States. By enriching those who produce and supply drugs, prohibition supports terrorists who sell protection services to drug traffickers.

Prohibition harms the public health:

Patients suffering from cancer, glaucoma and other conditions cannot use marijuana under the laws of most states or the federal government despite abundant evidence of its efficacy. Terminally ill patients cannot always get adequate pain medication because doctors may fear prosecution by the Drug Enforcement Administration.

Prohibition breeds disrespect for the rule of law:

Prohibitions breed disrespect for the law because despite draconian penalties and extensive enforcement, huge numbers of people still violate prohibition. This means those who break the law, and those who do not, learn that obeying laws is for suckers.

And the number one reason that may resonate with the public in these perilous economic times: Prohibition is a financial drain.

Federal, state and local governments spend roughly $44 billion per year to enforce drug prohibition. These same governments forego roughly $33 billion per year in tax revenue they could collect from legalized drugs, assuming these were taxed at rates similar to those on alcohol and tobacco. Under prohibition, these revenues accrue to traffickers as increased profits.

President Obama‘s new plan to spend $700 million for border security is the wrong approach. And that’s in addition to Merida:

The funds, meant to assist what administration officials described as an “anti-smuggling effort,” will complement ongoing U.S. aid to Mexico under the Merida initiative, a three-year $1.4 billion package aimed at helping Mexico fight the drug cartels with law enforcement training, military equipment and improved intelligence cooperation.

The war on drugs is a failure. Plan Mexico will crash and burn.

Related articles by Zemanta


Potty Ideas Drives Jobs Summit into Ecstasy!

February 27, 2009

All aboardImage by Cle0patra via Flickr

Press Release: MildGreens

Potty Ideas Drives Jobs Summit into Ecstasy!

The appearance of the NORMLCANNABUS” on the Television Three evening news at the Jobs Summit created a lighthearted segway to the ‘bad news’ from the Reserve Bank Governor – however despite a great camera shot, the bus’s presence or purpose at the event was not explored any further.

Legal regulation of Cannabis would not only have an impact in the New Zealand economy, globally, it would bring back in to legal circulation about a trillion dollars that can be invested back into the community and towards trade. Such creative thinking is particularly targeted at EU and western economies who seem to need any and all leverage options and ideas to shorten and flatten this recession. The United States largest state economy, California, is considering legal regulation of cannabis very seriously.

The UN Office of Drug Control is hosting a discussion this March on all drug prohibitions and how effective they deliver health to people. New Zealand is sending Associate Health Minister, Hon Peter Dunne. He has already declared he is not at all receptive to cannabis legalisation…. no matter how far he is prepared to throw the country down the toot, he is emphatically opposed. So why send him, keep him at home and bank the money.

It has been often quoted elsewhere, but I repeat here for its timeliness and relevance to the NZ job summit, “times of regulated recreational substances and no money are easier than all the money in the world and unregulated and bottomless prohibition into which it is poured.”

D-classification of cannabis will reinstate social cohesion and resiliency while balancing the books from both sides.

Message to Prime Minister Rt Hon. John Key, call Jeffrey Miron!

Jeffrey Miron, Director of Undergraduate Studies, Address: Littauer Center M-28. E-Mail: miron@fas.harvard.edu. Tel: 617-495-4129
www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/miron

Costs of Marijuana Prohibition: Economic Analysis

Dr. Jeffrey Miron, visiting professor of economics at Harvard University. Dr. Miron’s paper, “The Budgetary Implications of Marijuana Prohibition,” see www.prohibitioncosts.org/

Social Ecologist ‘at large’
http://mildgreens.blogspot.com/
http://blairformayor.blogspot.com/
http://blair4mayor.com/
http://efsdp.org/

ph (643) 389 4065 cell 027 265 7219

Related articles by Zemanta

Prohibition Doesnt Work

July 27, 2008

PROHIBITION DOESN’T WORK (no matter which way you hold your mouth)

Cover of Cover via Amazon

The White House had the National Research Council [www.nationalacademies.org/nrc/] examine the data being gathered about drug use and the effects of U.S. drug policies. NRC concluded, “__the nation possesses little information about the effectiveness of current drug policy, especially of drug law enforcement.__” And what data exist show “little apparent relationship between severity of sanctions prescribed for drug use and prevalence or frequency of use.” In other words, there is no proof that prohibition “the cornerstone of U.S. drug policy for a century” reduces drug use. = National Research Council. Informing America’s Policy on Illegal Drugs: What We Don’t Know Keeps Hurting Us. National Academy Press, 2001. p. 193.

“There is no logical basis for the prohibition of marijuana.” = Milton Friedman (an economist of note that BERL might recall)

Image adapted from Image:MiltonFriedman.jpg ht...Image via Wikipedia

In the “The Budgetary Implications of Marijuana Prohibition,” a report recently done by Harvard economics professor Jeffrey Miron, on the causes of drug crime, Miron said his research “very much suggests that it is prohibition. It’s not drug-consumption-related, it’s fighting-over-disputes-in-the-illegal-drug-trade-related. And that’s a result of prohibition, not a result of the drug.”

Hubert Williams, President, Police Foundation; former Chief of Police, Newark, New Jersey said “Miron persuasively demonstrates, the net effects of prohibition, both past and present, are to increase violence, enrich criminals, threaten civil liberties, and make drug users more ill. The right question for policy makers, he concludes, is not whether drugs are misused but whether the benefits of prohibition outweigh its exorbitant costs. All in all, this is a solidly researched and dispassionate discussion of a topic that is too often couched in moral and emotional terms.”

Aside from the NZ Police’s questionable use of the DRUG HARM INDEX to self interestedly perpetuate an unaccounted policy, demanding as it were ‘more resources’ without any accounting for ‘deliverable outcomes’ is entirely contestable in managerial let alone economic terms. The Drug Squad is in effect ‘deficit funded’ without as much a skerit of evidence that the resources AND priorities are allocated with ANY efficiency.

This is POOR management. This was roundly critiqued by visiting top cop and former head of Scotland Yard Narcotics/London Metro, Chief Super Det. Eddie Ellison to the Ministry of Justice in 2004. (Eddie was also a founding member of TRANSFORM, now with UN consultative standing )
“It wouldn’t pass muster at Police College in let alone the Home Office. There is no room in modern policing for unaccountable deployment blindly following political directives” -(private conversation with the writer)
Eddie presented to 17 MoJ Officials alongside Snr Detective Jack Cole, both of whom were executive directors of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition [www.leap.cc] also recently

LondonImage via Wikipedia

accredited by the UN. Eddie also conveyed this to Gregg O’Conner of the Police Association.
Some months later the MoJ couldnt find a single person who attended the board meetingroom presentation, declaring again in a recorded telephone conversation to the writer “we have a very high staff turnover’

The BERL DRUG HARMS report and the subsequent Police Intelligence claims that cananbis is the problem, bring the POLICE once again into disrepute.

There is no accounting the POLICE and JUSTICE stupidity of continuing to bang ones head against the wall and hoping it will soon stop hurting….

/Blair

Related articles by Zemanta