Archive for the ‘Law Commission’ Category

Shapelle Corby on LawFuel

December 29, 2009

This case exemplifies all that is wrong with the international drug covenants and conventions to which New Zealand is a signatory.

Recent hangings in South East Asia, firing squads in China, and most recently two Kiwi’s arrested (and presumed guilty) for 3.5oz of cannabis between them in India, (the home of Ganja, a plant named as sacred along with the river Ganges) all happen because we as a nation collectively give licence to kill and incarcerate cruelly and inhumanely.

Where is the legal profession on drug policy?

Or is the substantial legal aid grift and perpetual social mayhem an incentive for a silence closely resembling stupidity? NZ’s own National Drug Intelligence Bureau chief along with the BERL Drug Harm report (though much criticised) states that the revenue ‘churn’ through the legal system is a DRUG HARM.

The LEGAL profession are beneficiaries of the unintended consequences. So when are you collectively going to talk about that?

To the Law Commission? Yeah Right!

Curiously, in Christchurch’s sister city Seattle, it was the law profession that lead drug policy law reform. see King County Bar Association – http://www.kcba.org/druglaw/

“The principal objectives of this effort are: reductions in crime and public disorder; improvement of the public health; better protection of children; and wiser use of scarce public resources.”

sig Blair Anderson, Christchurch. 027 2657219
http://www.leap.cc http://mildgreens.blogspot.com

Handle on Non-Lethal Force For Change

June 20, 2009

Following the recent Queensland multi-tased death arrest I have noticed a consistent representation of views on blogs and media comment pages that validates my concerns that the general populace would go along with this fear of crime thing. (manufactured consent?)

A Stun Gun making an electrical arc between it...Image via Wikipedia

Much of it is predicated on drug myths. (much the same as crack, crank and meth led to up scaling from .38’s to .45 and to automatics).

1:1 meetings this week with local [National] MP’s only trot out more tough on behaviour, crime, tough on alcohol…. and meth. Despite all evidence to the contrary.

The BERL report(s) on drug harms released prior to the Law Commission discussion documents is a failure in due process as well as ‘failure in reason’ misstating the problem by orders of magnitude.

When can we expect someone factor in the benefits of ‘common civility’.

No Media in New Zealand has written critically of the implication of applied, and now law, Class D drug policy. No Member of the House has regaled.

Yet, like BERL’s reports, it’s a MoH issue. Drugs=Minister’s Warrant, Alcohol=Ministry’s Brief.

Public perception… Taser’d means drugged.
Where is the ‘legal’ sector on this.?
http://www.wkrg.com/crime/article/lawsuit-filed-by-mother-of-man-who-died-after-being-tasered/113391/http://www.wkrg.com/crime/article/children_zapped_by_stun_gun/25801/

Today’s Police arbitrary ‘handle on gun’ ownership issue even cites Napier’s ‘Molenaar’ incident while pot smoking was likely the very effective, safe and economic anti-anxiolotic scientific research shows it to be and, was by the perpetrators community actions, ‘mediating meth in the community’ no good story can be told.

More guns will be found to be ‘semi-automatic’ and the cycle begins again. Any gun elevates drug [prohibition] harm. Feeds fear. Allocates more Money for Failure.

Professor of Law, Jock Young had it right back in the seventies. “deviancy amplifying” all right! BERL’s economists wouldn’t know a benefit or a behavior if they fell over them and RH. John Key wouldn’t know a science adviser if one fell over him.

I recall a certain Minister of Health back in 1975 who, on enactment of the Misuse of Drugs Act, said that it ‘would give the Police powers to which they were not entitled’, how prophetic.

— Blair Anderson ‹(•¿•)›

Related articles by Zemanta


New Scientist: Cannabis Kamatua Needed.

May 20, 2009

Cannabis Kamatua Needed

Wed May 20 23:22:10 BST 2009 by Blair Anderson

Cannabis sativa, scientific drawing.Image via Wikipedia

The endless charade maintaining cannabis prohibition on a global scale is being challenged in New Zealand as it reviews its ‘all drug policy‘ through the statutory empowered Law Commission. New Zealand has already given royal assent and passed into law the regulatory model for legal sale, storage, cultivation and manufacture, labeling, place of sale, age of consent and research oversight (Oct 6th, 2008). The UN consultation phase pre-Vienna avoided any recognition either in local or international media of this world first initiative yet cannabis is used in NZ at a rate higher than Jamaica, with clear evidence of extremely damaging consequences to some individuals, the deviancy amplification principally caused by covert Policing. There is scope for New Zealand to lead the world in reform options if it takes the policy analytic approach. The world needs a new Holland!

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227096.300-comment-get-real-drug-czars.html
– /Blair

Related articles by Zemanta


Cannabis Intel, a "confident suppose" is the best we’ll get!

December 21, 2008

SAN FRANCISCO - JULY 13:  Baggies of medicinal...Getty Images via Daylife

“We have never had anything to say what are we achieving … I suppose this is giving us a measure.” – NDIB on the Drug Harm Index
(Note: it has taken our National Drug Intelligence Bureau, since it was formed in 1972, to come up with a ‘confident suppose’ , go figure! /Blair )

Mills also said, “That kind of information could also be helpful for appealing for funds in future police budgets.”

“If I wanted to ensure I got my fair share of the budget within police and I had to proof what I was going to achieve in various operations, then that’s a very helpful tool.” – Stuart Mills, NDIB (NZH http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10518236)

And the difference you and yours have made is Mr Mills?

Which goes a long way to explaining why the Police never took part in BEYOND2008, or blanket refusal to even ‘chatham house’ with Judge Jerry Paradis. These ‘law’ enforcers are not intel-gatherers, they are propaganda promoters and should be reigned-in for telling pork pies.

…….none more so than

“A new breed of powerful cannabis and ballooning costs in treating its health effects have led to calls for urgent action, including drug education for primary school children. ”

Claims of high-potency “re-engineered” cannabis coupled to the supposition of increased net harm, non evidential ‘statistics’ of mental health consequences (where the best science shows even ‘association’ correlation to mental health is “low“/ Prof Iverson, UK).
The Police make an appalling claim to ‘drug education’ expertise.. “Included is a call to curb the “alarming” trend of teenagers to use cannabis by making drug education programmes an immediate priority in primary schools.”
as if this will inoculate these kids… (more DARE budget? So when did that start working? I see no evidence here… just argument for prohibitions shortcomings. The USA recently discovered that grade 12 students more likley to smoke grass than tobacco, so which part of the policy ‘informs us’ on what to do? /Blair)
New cannabis type prompts call for action
A new breed of powerful cannabis and ballooning costs in treating its health effects have led to calls for urgent action, including drug education for primary school children.
By ANNA CHALMERS and BEN FAWKES – The Dominion Post Monday, 22 December 2008
Call to teach cannabis dangers
Teens turn to potent new form of cannabis
ANNA CHALMERS and BEN FAWKES – The Dominion Post Monday, 22 December 2008
Cannabis tops list of illicit drugs sending people to hospital
Cannabis use is causing more admissions to publicly-funded hospitals than all of the other illegal drugs combined, a police drugs specialist has found.
NZH 5:00AM Wednesday Jun 25, 2008 By Elizabeth Binning
So which bit of Policy is the bit that is not working again? Could it be that this is happening on NDIB’s watch? Any correlation between NDIB and prohibitary practices is entirely historical. Now they are experts at what’s wrong? Gimeabreak!
Society is right to be sceptical about this unquestioned media hype, noting both Police AND media are seemingly unaware that RECREATIONAL SOFT and PSYCHOACTIVE drugs have been regulated in New Zealand since November the Sixth 2008. [or] Perhaps this is what this is really about. If so, let NDIB take their argument to the Law Commission.
That is the forum in which they can present their evidence and have it tested.
In the mean time POLICE can stay right away from young people… Title page to Locke's Some Thoughts Concerning...Image via Wikipedia
“Pressures have always been there but the shift is that now children are being taught they can’t cope,” said Prof Hayes who lectures at the institute which is part of Oxford Brookes University. The more people obsessed about their problems, the harder they were to get over, he said. He claimed that having a mental health problem was now seen like wearing a “badge of honour”.
Adding to the ‘Worry box’ – The stress young children face as a result of tests and the pressures of modern life have featured in the media in recent months and years. “Therapeutic education” which places emotions over intellect, puts up barriers to learning by assuming everyone has problems, he said. Instead teachers should concentrate on teaching their subjects, he argued. The arguments are contained in a new book Prof Hayes has co-written with fellow educationalist Kathryn Ecclestone, The Dangerous Rise of Therapeutic Education.
Blair Anderson
http://www.efsdp.org
http://mildgreens.blogspot.com/

Related articles by Zemanta

Jeremy Douglas, RNZ interview.

November 24, 2008

The Radio New Zealand National logoImage via Wikipedia
re: Interview by Kathryn Ryan on Radio New Zealand

09:20am New Zealand and the international drug trade / Jeremy Douglas, Manager of the UNODC’s Global Smart programme which is tracking the international drug trade, which he says is getting increasingly sophisticated. (listen here)

Jeremy Douglas, Manager of the UNODC’s Global Smart programme is obviously the product of a dumbed down education system.

There is nothing smart about this man. He is a puppet ideologue rabbiting ‘more of the same’ failed UN drug war creating fears, drug markets and drug related harms where there should be none.
Shinjuku Triad SocietyImage via Wikipedia
Watch the sleigh of hand descriptions associating TRIADS with precursors and local gangs, horse tranquilizers and especially Ecstasy (MDMA), one of the more benign drugs now vilified by the prohibitory politics and vested interests passing off as health prevention – and he is here professing to inform OUR Police! Keep him out of the country, he and his ’emerging drug threat’ message is more dangerous than any radical Muslim cleric.

New Zealand’s problem with and popularity of methamphetamine is a PRODUCT of the very system he describes.

He and his ilk are the very reason UNGASS is re-examining the Hoover/Nixon/Reagan/Bush ‘War on Drugs‘ as is our own Law Commission.

Supporting prohibition and being anti-crime is a contradiction. Because drugs are bad doesn’t mean prohibition is good.

Douglas no doubt must be appalled to learn that on Nov 6th, New Zealand legislated recreational soft drug use, making provision for controlled markets. Now there would have been in interesting question for someone purporting to be so well informed!

Doh!

Blair Anderson
50 Wainoni Road,
Christchurch.

03 3894065

Related articles by Zemanta

SAFER Christchurch – A MildGreen Initiative?

October 22, 2008

Flag of the World Health OrganizationIs WHO at loggerheads with
UN foundation principles
over drug issue?

Media Release – Another MildGreen Initiative

SAFER Christchurch – A MildGreen Initiative?


Christchurch City, yesterday awarded by the World Health Organisation (WHO) for its safe city initiatives at this weeks international talk fest “SAFER Communities”, is also being contributed too by longtime city resident health and safety campaigner Blair Anderson today in Victoria Square.

The former city Mayoral aspirant has been an outspoken advocate for informed dialog around public policy bringing to the city’s attention the highly successful program ‘SAFER’ with its focus on reducing alcohol related harms.

“Does use of Cannabis contribute to morbidity, sexual assaults, domestic violence, violent crime? Obviously no, but the same cannot be said for Alcohol.” says the proponent for Safer Alternatives For Enjoyable Recreation [SAFER] “Clearly cannabis is less harmful to the user and society than alcohol, the prohibiting of adults from making the rational, safer choice is bad public policy.”

Anderson draws the attention of media during this election to the ‘unquestioned’ six year moratorium on discussing cannabis policy despite enormous international and domestic progress by civil society at the highest level. “This is history in the making” says the proponent for law reform, “both at the UNGASS and NZ’s Law Commission review.”

The MildGreen ‘Class-D’ drug classification, first proposed at the Misuse of Drugs Ammendment #4 Select Committee review is seen as world leading policy applauded by visiting experts and NZ drug czar, Hon Jim Anderton. But how many know it came from the home of law reform and international drug policy harm reduction – Christchurch?

Recently Professor of Law (Otago) Kevin Dawkins declared Class-D the innovation required to provide a legislative frame work for drug control. (see NZ Law Journal)

“The stymied discussion has seen our communities struggle with deficient drug policy, seen an escalation in hard drug prohibition related harms and a continuing, if expedient, political clamour for draconian sentencing absent any robust test of what is broken.” says Anderson.

“When have you heard political leadership or candidates tested on drug war efficacy” by journalists or commentators?, “Yet we are the only western democracy held to ransom by a mere 1% of the MMP vote that access to the treasury cheque book is governed by a clause that thou shalt not talk about cannabis for two electoral terms.”

Christchurch’s sister city, Seattle described in a letter to Denver Colorado authorities that the SAFER initiative there had been declared successful and cheap. Even opponents of the pro-marijuana initiative in Seattle, City Attorney Tom Carr, said his fears that usage would spike dramatically haven’t materialised, noting that the “treat cannabis as the lowest possible priority” directive to police had seen minor drug offences plummet to a mere 59 for all of Seattle.

We should not be surprised that our Mayor, Bob Parker has patently refused to even discuss the initiative despite all-out ratepayer funded response to the alcohol problem in the city.

In these uncertain economic times all alternatives deserve to be ‘on the table’ says the communitarian social ecologist.

The curious are welcome to come and see and discuss the implications of this crime reducing health inspired city wide policy initiative at a lunch time forum on the steps in front of the Cathedral at Noon today and later outside the City of Christchurch Convention Centre – the venue hosting the SAFER CITIES milliondollar “talk about everything but” boondoggle.

The MildGreen Initiative recently sponsored the tour by” Law Enforcement Against Prohibition” proponent and retired British Columbia Provincial Law Court Judge Jerry Paradis.

Blair Anderson ‹(•¿•)›
50 Wainoni Road,
Christchurch, ph (643) 389 4065 cell 027 265 7219

"Beyond 2008" Regional Report gets a "D"

April 9, 2008

An 'ecstasy' tablet - seized by law enforeceme...Image via Wikipedia

“Beyond 2008” Regional Report.

This report presents the findings from the consultations held in Australia and New Zealand as part of Beyond 2008, a project of the Vienna NGO Committee on Narcotic Drugs. Beyond 2008 is a rare opportunity for grass-roots expertise to contribute to a global drug policy process.

The Australian and New Zealand consultation round was one of thirteen held in nine regions across the world.

Here is what it said about Class D in the New Zealand section.

A selection of products containing BZP.Image via Wikipedia

An example of flexibility in legislation is the introduction of an additional class (Restricted Substances category, colloquially known as “class D” in the schedule of controlled drugs under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1974). Benzylpiperazine (BZP) is currently the only drug in this schedule, leading some participants to note that the schedule is under-utilised. Giving some weight to this argument, BZP has recently been reclassified as a class C1 controlled drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act. The upcoming review of the Misuse of Drugs Act was noted as an opportunity to further explore the boundaries of the flexibility around drug control legislation and related policy.


Notably, although the writer and CLASS-D advocate was an offical ‘interloper’ who just turned up, (easier to ask permission later) and contributed to the evidence base on behalf of NZ’s 500,000 pot consumers, there was no mention in dispatches. For the international voices attending Beyond 2008 Class D was a novel response worthy of maintaining a watching brief on. Certainly the above acnowledgement of CLASS D as a means to an end (and to consideration by the Law Commission) by further enabling of the ‘boundaries of the flexibility around drug control legislation and related policy’ can only be a good thing.
full text can be obtained here
These are interesting times…..

Blair Anderson ‹(•¿•)›
Related articles by Zemanta