Archive for the ‘Pro-Legalization’ Category

Cops mission; die honorably for hopeless causes.

May 7, 2009

“What are they [Jan] trying to protect? That is what I want to know. A silly marijuana plant? What a thing to protect … [and] take someone’s life.” – Mrs Molenaar despaired that Mr Snee’s life had been lost over a small amount of drugs.

Cop shot Dead, two more Police plus a member of the public in serious
condition, and we pretend drug policy is working! Like the case of Officer Don
Wilkinson, another severe case of deviancy amplification created under Warrant
of the Minister of Health, Tony Ryall! /Blair.

read more digg story

Related articles by Zemanta


Dutch mayors back plan to cultivate cannabis

November 25, 2008

Cannabis sativa, scientific drawing.Image via Wikipedia

4:00AM Tuesday November 25, 2008

The Dutch city of Eindhoven has caused a stir with a plan to set up a cannabis plantation to supply marijuanaMore

This NZH item is notable for the lack of any cognition as to why it might be relevant to the massive demograph of New Zealand’ers for whom Cannabis is a familiar experience given that we passed into law the very regulations (Class D) required to supply and control soft drugs such as cannabis. /Blair

Related articles by Zemanta

Helen Clark on Pot

October 13, 2008

Helen ClarkImage via Wikipedia PM Helen Clark was speaking on the University of Otago campus today where she announced the implementation of a Universal Student Allowance. She speaks about marijuana in response to a question [a Dunedin Electorate Candidate for the ALCP] asked of her. [Monday 13 October 2008]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Czxr30xBC34

Julian: I’m from the National Organisation for Reform of Marijuana Laws. The issue’s been quite contentious down here this year but we’re very thankful for [MP] Pete Hodgson.. he’s made efforts to bring medical marijuana to some patients in the form of Sativex. My question is ” If Labour wins the election are the cannabis laws likely to be relaxed further?”

Helen Clark: The fact that cannabis has been an illegal drug doesn’t mean that if it has advantage for medical conditions -and certainly some advocate it for treatment of glaucoma – that it can’t be considered for that.

We have had select committee reports look at this issue and there is a whole range of points of view: Should there be partial prohibition, should there be partial decriminalisation?
I think its time we had a more rational debate about these issues but its difficult to have a rational debate. In my view the greatest killers in our country are actually tobacco and alcohol and its effects on the road.

Medical Cannabis ClubImage by Thomas Hawk via FlickrBut the rub is given the harm of those perfectly legal drugs at the moment – and tobacco is one where used as intended it does kill a significant number of people who use it – theres obviously considerable reluctance to actually legalise others.

But I think we need to have a continuing and rational debate about what the best form of the law is and look at what is happening in other western countries where theres a wider range of approaches

Of course, aside from the abuse of due process, lack of cognition that this is about ‘prohibition, not medpot, that there is a Law Commision review – the question not asked by media is “Who is going to sign up to a coalition agreement where thou shalt not speak about cannabis ‘in this term of governance’ else forego the treasury cheque book” ? /Blair

— ends —-

Consider this PRESS item from 2000

“Duck shoving” is what Health Minister Annette King calls it. They are too scared to talk about it, she says. She has smoked dope, in her younger years. “I admitted it. Some people would not be honest. There’s no point in saying no, anyway, when people knowing you years ago would say: ‘She’s a liar’.”

New Zealand is almost certainly heading into a review of laws governing cannabis, with Ms King at the helm. Temporarily, the review is on hold, blocked by the Greens. It will take the three Government parties to find common ground as to which select committee should deal with the issue before any review gets under way. Whichever way it goes, the chance is that within two years, people caught smoking weed could be given fines in the same way that speeding tickets Annette King Lies!Image by Simon Lieschke via Flickrare issued. Anti dope-smoking billboards and TV adverts would go hand in hand, along with more direct peer pressure-type programmes aimed in particular at Maoris. “I’m pretty sure there won’t be a recommendation for legalising,” Ms King says. The picture is less clear on how MPs will decide in a free vote in Parliament on part decriminalisation. “I know no-one in Labour who wants to legalise. “Some people want to look at a partial decriminalisation. There’s no party position on legalising.” (lies: it was a remit from the floor of the Labour Party in 1998/Blair) Ms King at first says she is uncertain how she will vote, but then expands on her thoughts. “You can’t have prohibition. The law is broken every minute of the day. “We have to look at harm minimisation from a health perspective, and containment from a policing perspective.” [more]

Blair Anderson
http://mildgreens.blogspot.com
Related articles by Zemanta

Massey on Meth and other stuff

April 29, 2005

The supply and demand model describes how pric...Image via Wikipedia

The economics of illicit drug markets
[ Click here to download a PDF of the original printed version of this story ]
In a kind of convenient shorthand, people often refer to Dr Chris Wilkins as an illicit-drug researcher. This is true, as far as it goes, but a more adequate description would be that he is a New Institutional Economist with a particular interest in stateless economic systems such as illicit drug markets.
New Institutional Economics (NIE) is an economic school which studies the role institutions play in economic behavior and performance. These include formal institutions such as the law and the state, and informal institutions such as social custom, norms of behavior and ideology. “ NIE looks at the institutional context of economic behaviour,” explains Wilkins. “It looks beyond the workings of demand, supply and pricing to examine how institutions, property rights, social convention and transaction and information costs affect the decision-making of economic actors and the performance of economic systems.”
New Institutional Economics is particularly suited to the study of ‘stateless economies’: economies where there is no state to enforce contracts or property rights, and this includes illicit drug markets. In his PhD thesis Wilkins looked at the workings of cannabis markets, where, in the absence of legal enforcement and remedies, cheating might be expected to be widespread. But Wilkins found these markets were typified by generally reliable transacting between buyers and sellers. The reason, says Wilkins, lies in the search and information costs associated with these exchanges. “ In the legal economy exchange is generally impersonal. In the supermarket you don’t know the person at the till and you may not even deal with cash. In the cannabis black market the buyer typically knows the seller, can inspect the product, and hands over cash. It is very personal, very face-to-face.”Circulation in macroeconomicsImage via Wikipedia
“In the clandestine illicit drug market it can be quite difficult for buyers and sellers to find one another. Legal commodities are advertised, and there are public retail outlets. In the cannabis market it is difficult to obtain information about the location of sellers, and the quality and prices of products. It takes some effort even for experienced buyers to assess the options available in the market. This means that in cannabis markets both the buyer and the seller make a significant time investment in the exchange relationship, and that constrains cheating to some extent. If a cannabis seller cheats a customer, then that customer won’t return, and that’s potentially a big loss.”
In a recent paper, Wilkins and Professor Sally Casswell explored the role gangs play in outdoor cannabis cultivation in New Zealand. The analysis in the paper suggests that gangs are unlikely to have complete monopoly control of cannabis cultivation – cannabis is too easy to cultivate and rival cannabis cultivators and cannabis crops too hard to deter and detect – though Wilkins is quick to say this does not mean the gangs do not have persuasive advantages elsewhere in the cannabis market, or when it comes to other drugs. In their paper Wilkins and Caswell set out the conditions under which an illicit drug market most favours the involvement of organised crime. These occur where there are cost advantages from larger-scale production, where there is a need for specialised skills, capital equipment or large amounts of start-up capital, and where there are visible targets for violence aimed at discouraging competition. While a few seeds, some potting mix and a secluded patch of ground are all that is required to cultivate cannabis, manufacturing methamphetamine is a much more technical and sophisticated process , says Wilkins. “You need to have access to the appropriate precursor chemicals and have the knowledge and equipment required for manufacture.”
Anecdotally, ‘cooks’ – the amateur chemists who manufacture methamphetamine – have became much sought after. Highly skilled, they can command premiums, and such is the demand that kidnappings are not unknown.Law of Diminishing Marginal UtilityImage via Wikipedia
Stories have circulated that gangs traditionally at odds are co-operating in the methamphetamine market. “Working together may be a rational way of gaining access to rare precursor chemicals and to exchange manufacture techniques.”One of the flow-on effects of the rise in the use of methamphetamine may be to extend the power and influence of New Zealand’s gangs, in much the same way that Prohibition once strengthened the hand of the Mafia in America. If this is happening then it will mirror trends that have been seen internationally. A report by the United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime has noted a shift away from “a loose network of independent laboratory operators towards larger organisations able to produce more and better drugs at lower costs. The larger groups are more flexible, and are able to identify and exploit any lucrative business opportunity, as well as any flaws in law enforcement efforts. They assist each other to more efficiently produce, market and distribute their products.”Organised crime - cash flowImage via Wikipedia
Wilkins is the current recipient of a Fast Start grant from the Marsden fund to investigate which illicit drug markets nurture the development of organised crime.

Related articles by Zemanta