Archive for the ‘UN Conventions’ Category

Evidence Is In, and is Exonerative……

July 28, 2008

United Nations Security Council.UN Security Council
in disrepute?
“Evidence Is In” and is Exonerative……

What should be a matter of social justice and inclusive politics has been reduced to the logical equivalent of water-boarding.

The failure of ‘due process’ in the USA is dirt on the hands of those who govern and they should be held to account.

It is therefore up to the citizens of the USA to regale at the UN Convention on Narcotics under which they are shackled and join in the global push to disenfranchise the INCB‘s hold on the debate.

There has never been a better chance available to all world citizens to circumvent the tyranny of the majority than UNODC Vienna 2009.

It is, as it were, in your hands… each and everyone of you.

see Beyond 2008 NGO consultation recommendations containing clear harm reduction and human rights language, calling for evidence-based, culturally and socially sensitive approaches, calling for inclusion of all affected and stigmatised populations, access to alternative livelihoods before eradication, improved access to essential medicines under treaty control, encouraging alternatives to criminal/prison sanctions, analysing unintended consequences of the drug control system, taking into account traditional licit uses, and many more.

This is the stuff of social capital. Back the horse that is winning.

On the Take, and other media myths

July 14, 2008

Half truths layered on half truths couched in the pejorative.

Notably NZH’s Marketplace [below] is addressed to the reader in Any-City, Any-Town New Zealand and reveals more insight into the real drug problem.

Nine million contributors to last weeks Vienna NGO meetings highlighted the systemic failures in drug policy overlooked by drug warriors and its followers the anti-drug league. This report proves the case, availability of drugs of concealment and horror are a product of bad policy, while overlooking the real plague (up to 70%of the entire health vote according to the UK NHS) … legal alcohol.

It is notable too that the drug consumer is the only person asked and the inferences drawn from those answers applied to a general populace (by city). There is a dangerous inference that ‘everyone is doing it’ but in reality the figures indemnify the cannabis consumer who by far are under represented in this data set but who are, by slight of manufactured consent, made to appear next to heroin.

Lead researcher Chris Wilkins said overall levels of methamphetamine use appeared to be fairly stable, but there was a growing number of heavy users experiencing health and legal problems. (why are the problems ‘compounding?’ drugs are a health problem and the misuse of drugs act exacted under the warrant of the minister of health.)

That is at loggerheads with last weeks unreported UN Vienna NGO’s call for a new approach to drug control policy recognising “the human rights abuses against people who use drugs“,

We called for “evidence-based” drug policy focused on “mitigation of short-term and long-term harms” and “full respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms

New Zealand’s Law Commission’s statutory review of Drugs and Justice is both timely and usefull in examining the kiwi compliance to UN Conventions.

Civil processes are unanimous calling on the U.N. to shift drug control’s primary emphasis from interdiction to treatment and prevention and report on the collateral consequences of the current criminal justice-based approach to drugs and to provide an analysis of the unintended consequences of the drug control system” and or comprehensive “reviews of the application of criminal sanctions as a drug control measure, and alternatives to incarceration”.

Harm reduction ‘a necessary and worthwhile response to drug abuse’ must recognise the sovereignty of the user, in both use and/or in transition to low risk use or abstention.

Management of Drug Harms is consistent with principal aspirations of the National Drug Policy and surprisingly most academics, political parties and journalists I have spoken with.

The third annual Illicit Drug Monitoring System report is no testimony to prohibition’s success and cool comfort to those who advocate intolerance and marginalisation.

The question now, is ‘when does the hard work begin?‘ /Blair

Christchurch drug users ‘take whatever they can get’ – report – NZH 14-07-2008

Photo / Glenn Jeffrey

Drug users in Christchurch have a take “whatever they can get” mentality, according to a report out today.

In Auckland, the “drug of choice” is methamphetamine or ‘P’, while in Wellington it is ecstasy, Massey University’s third annual Illicit Drug Monitoring System report says.

But researchers found that Christchurch users stretched to injection of pharmacy and industrial-use drugs like the horse tranquiliser ketamine (only available from vets) , behavioural drug Ritalin (only available from doctors) , and opiates made from prescription morphine sulfate (only available from patients).

Opiates, usually morphine sulfate converted into heroin and injected, were the second most commonly used drug in Christchurch after cannabis. They ranked seventh in Auckland and fifth in Wellington. (proof the differential may be due to social and economic factors than the pharacology of the drug… doh!)

As a result, Christchurch had a large efficient black market for the drugs, the report said. (and Auckland and Wellington doesnt? – huh! )

Cannabis was still the king of the country’s drugs, with the highest use and availability of any illegal substance. (the comparison is irrational… )

Lead researcher Chris Wilkins said overall levels of methamphetamine use appeared to be fairly stable, but there was a growing number of heavy users experiencing health and legal problems. (legal problems, is this a cure and is it effacious? see above!)

Frequent methamphetamine users were more likely to have committed violent or property crime last year compared to the 2005 findings, he said. (still unclear, but panders to the ‘everybody knows’ syndrome facilitated by a media that misrepresents the association)

Police National Drug Intelligence Bureau co-ordinator Detective Inspector Stuart Mills said the intensification of P use was worrying as it led to more crime. (it certainly has, and by all accounts it is getting worse, about in proportion to the application of prohibition, so why does he support continued use of a policy that has so evidentially failed to deliver. )

The report, an annual snapshot of the nation’s drug use, was produced by interviewing 642 drug users from the three main centres.

Easy to obtain

The survey found methamphetamine was easy or very easy to obtain in its locally made form, commonly known as P, but imported “crystal” methamphetamine was more difficult to get than in 2006.

This was possibly because of large seizures made by police and customs in the last two years.

The price of methamphetamine was stable at $100/point (0.1g).

The survey, which was established in 2005 to provide information on drug use and drug-related harm in New Zealand, interviewed 110 methamphetamine users, 105 ecstasy users and 109 injecting drug users.

It found that frequent methamphetamine users were more likely to have used an ambulance, use accident and emergency departments or see a GP than in 2005.

They were also increasingly using counsellors, psychologists and social workers.

Frequent methamphetamine users were also more likely to have committed violent or property crime last year compared to the 2005 findings, Dr Wilkins said.

“Users are under increasing financial pressure, however only minorities of frequent users reported paying for their drug use with money from property crime and even smaller minorities committed violent crime,” he said.

The survey found that 53 per cent of respondents had used their unemployment benefit to pay for drugs and 14 per cent had performed sex work.

On average, individual methamphetamine users had spent more than $8000 on drugs in the last six months.

When users were asked if they had experienced specific harmful incidents as a result of the drug, 53 per cent said at times they had no money for food or rent, 46 per cent had been arrested and 39 per cent had had sex and later regretted it.

Of those questioned, 8 per cent said they had been sexually assaulted.

– NZPA, NZ HERALD STAFF

More Articles:
Next Drug abuse Story: Schapelle Corby may be investigated over drug admission
Drug abuse Homepage

This story was found at: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/topic/story.cfm?c_id=181&objectid=10521433&ref=rss

Copyright ©2007, APN Holdings NZ Limited

Crime expert: Using drugs a human right

June 18, 2008
DRUGS should be legalised because there is a “human right” to use them, according to a new book by an Irish criminal law expert.

see Crime expert: Using drugs a human right / By Cormac O’Keeffe (Irish Examiner)

Paul O’Mahony also said the war on drugs had “failed catastrophically” in Ireland, and across the world.

The Trinity College psychologist and criminologist said it was a “scandal” that enormous resources were being used to enforce prohibition. He said this policy had not only failed to lower drug use, but may have contributed to its increase.

In his book, The Irish War on Drugs, the Seductive Folly of Prohibition, Mr O’Mahony said the campaign for abolition needed a clear, rallying idea, which would cut through complex arguments.

“What is required to achieve a tipping point, a revolution in thinking, is a bold, inspirational idea to which people can subscribe as a matter of self-evident principle.

“Only the concept of a human right to use drugs can fulfil this role of providing a meaningful, inspiring and unifying idea which can guide the transition to a fully non-prohibitionist system.”

He said there was a human right to use drugs, so long as it did not negatively impact on the rights of others.

He said such a right was consistent with legal and constitutional concepts of individual freedom and human rights.

“Recognition of the right to use drugs is warranted in moral and legal terms and is in accord with the scientific understanding of human nature.” He said the appetite for mood-altering substances and new experiences was “normal” from a physical, psychological and social point of view.

Mr O’Mahony said prohibition had failed to acknowledge the differences between less and more dangerous illegal drugs and the fundamental similarities between illegal drugs and legal drugs, such as alcohol and prescribed drugs.

Related articles

I raised the HUMAN RIGHTS issue (and its international implications) at Beyond2008 in WGN. /Blair

Zemanta Pixie

Cliff Thornton will tour four countries while in Europe

March 1, 2008
DRUG PEACE DAYS IN VIENNA
The new version of the programme of the Drug Peace Days that are organised by ENCOD on 7, 8 and 9 March in Vienna is now available on http://www.encod.org/info/VIENNA-2008-TEN-YEARS-AFTER.html

The days will include a Drug Peace March on 7 March to the Vienna International Centre, seat of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, where from Monday 10 March onwards, the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs will have its 51. annual meeting. In this meeting, the CND will start its “year of reflection” on the results of the 10 global strategy to “significantly reduce the supply and demand for illicit drugs”, agreed upon in 1998 in New York. We intend to give them something to reflect about.

In the Conference that will be held in Vienna University on 8 & 9 March prominent US drug policy reformers such as Clifford Thornton, and Peter Webster will intervene, next to drug policy experts and activists from Europe and South America.. Cliff Thornton will also journey to Germany, France and Italy for presentations with elected Green Party officials and conferences in those countries.
The programme FLARE and all its participants www.flareprogramme.org(about 200 young people coming from more than twenty different countries, more than 40 organizations) will gather again for the third time in Italy, in the city of Bari, from 11 to 16 of March 2008, just after the Vienna meeting! I would really like to invite Mr Thorntorn will be in the city of Bari (southerm Italy) on March 12th to hold a seminar upon alternative solution to drug trafficking.

For those of you who wish to make the trip to Vienna, you can find information on hotel accomodation on our website. If you need any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Best wishes,
Joep Oomen
EUROPEAN COALITION FOR JUST AND EFFECTIVE DRUG POLICIES
Lange Lozanastraat 14 – 2018 Antwerpen – Belgium
Tel. + 32 (0)3 293 0886 – Mob. + 32 (0)495 122644
E-mail: info@encod.org <mailto:info@encod.org> / http://www.encod.org/
<http://www.encod.org/>

Efficacy
PO Box 1234
860 657 8438
Hartford, CT 06143
efficacy@msn.com
http://www.efficacy-online.org/

“THE DRUG WAR IS MEANT TO BE WAGED NOT WON”

Working to end race and class drug war injustice, Efficacy is a non profit 501 (c) 3 organization founded in 1997. Your gifts and donations are tax deductible


Blair Anderson ‹(•¿•)›

Social Ecologist ‘at large’
http://mildgreens.blogspot.com
http://blairformayor.blogspot.com
http://blair4mayor.com

ph (643) 389 4065 cell 027 265 7219

The Situation in Afghanistan

June 18, 2003
(excerpt)

We received two briefings this morning – on the overall situation in Afghanistan and on the challenges posed by drug cultivation and trafficking. Mr Costa’s excellent briefing was a stark reminder of the inter-relationships between economic, political and security factors contributing to ongoing instability. Addressing the drug economy is a necessary first step in countering a range of illegal activities. The link between drugs, the authority of the central government, its ability to implement key milestones in the Bonn Agreement and broader security, continues to present major challenges. We are very appreciative of the efforts of the UN Office for Drugs and Crime and those member States making significant contributions to drug eradication efforts in Afghanistan.

– Statement by the New Zealand Deputy Permanent Representative, Mr Tim McIvor – United Nations Security Council, 17 June 2003

(now compare progress in eradication since 1990 – oh dear)

Blair Anderson
http://mildgreens.blogspot.com